The Great Singapore Ripoff

Medical Tourism and the Dr Susan Lim Saga

With overcharging specialists like Dr Susan Lim and some members of her fraternity saying doctors can, when warranted, charge up to S$300,000 a day in fees, Singapore can well forget about emerging as the healthcare destination for those in need of medical attention.

Dr Lim, who has become a symbol of extreme greed, has been in the news the last few days for the exorbitant charges she extracted from the Brunei royal family for treating a breast cancer patient from that household for around four years.

The family paid all the multi-million-dollar bills as long as the patient was alive. But after the patient’s death in 2007, Dr Lim produced a bill for S$24 million for five months of treatment. Brunei still was ready to pay up if it was offered a good discount. Later, however, it decided to bring it up with the Singapore Health Ministry.

The amount was not just astronomical by any stretch of imagination but was loaded with fraud. (For instance, when she brought in a specialist outside of her domain, he charged less than S$1,000. But she produced a bill of more than S$300,000 for the Brunei royal family.

I think this involves a combination of greed, criminality and stupidity. How can she assume that anyone will meet all her sky-high charges without a murmur even if it is one of the world’s richest people (Sultan of Brunei) picking up the bills?

Dr Susan Lim argues that she and the patient had agreed on a payment of S100,000 to $200,000 a day. This is weak reasoning. The agreement notwithstanding, the fact remains that the amount is atrocious.

Even the world’s best surgeons only charge a fraction of that amount. For instance, when she herself brought a top breast cancer surgeon from Europe to treat the same Brunei patient, his charge was only £15,000 a day for three days. Dr Lim then produced a bill for $320,000 for “emergency long-distance coordination.”

To me, the case is more than one involving a disciplinary issue. It is one that has criminal import, with fraudulent overcharging and markups. While Singapore is trying to become a medical hub, doctors like her can do lasting damage to the country’s ambitions.

Incidentally, Dr Lim is known as the first surgeon to have performed a successful liver transplant in 1990. More on that at http://www.susanlimsurgery.com/dr_susan_lim.html

 –G Joslin Vethakumar

6 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

6 responses to “The Great Singapore Ripoff

  1. Pingback: Kanker Payudara: Dia Meninggal Meskipun Telah Menghabiskan Biaya Pengobatan Juta-an Dollar | Mengenal Kanker

  2. Judge rightly

    I think, it will not be fair the post the above story without posting the other side of the story at http://www.straitstimes.com/STForum/Story/STIStory_675946.html

    ST Forum
    Home > ST Forum > Story
    Jun 4, 2011
    Susan Lim’s lawyer clears the air on reports

    WE REFER to Wednesday’s reports (‘Attorney-General once acted for surgeon in overcharging case’ and ‘AGC refutes Jakarta Globe article on Susan Lim’). We act for Dr Susan Lim and wish to clarify certain statements in the articles.

    The first article stated that Dr Lim’s bill for treating the patient came to about $24.8 million and was eventually reduced to $3.25 million. This is the Singapore Medical Council’s (SMC) case and a point we had disputed in court.

    As we had presented in court, the patient, a member of the Brunei royal family, was under Dr Lim’s care for six years from 2001 to 2006. All bills rendered during this period were paid in full. Dr Lim’s final bill for treatment in 2007, which included payment for a team of doctors, nurses and infrastructure in two jurisdictions, Singapore and Brunei, was $12,079,687.50. This included third-party bills of $3,256,641.51. This entire amount remains outstanding.

    The article stated that the SMC disciplinary committee ‘stood down after… lawyers from Rajah & Tann claimed it had pre-judged the case’. This is an over-summary. An application was made by Dr Lim’s lawyers that the disciplinary committee should recuse itself on the basis of having pre-judged Dr Lim’s case. The SMC did not object to this application. The disciplinary committee, after consideration, agreed to recuse itself.

    The second article referred to the SMC’s table of alleged ‘mark-ups’ of up to 500 times. As submitted in open court by Dr Lim’s counsel, this allegation by SMC is false, mischievous and scandalous. Dr Lim has never marked up any third-party doctors’ bills. In fact, in the charge relating to the third-party doctor’s invoice that was allegedly marked up 500 times, the SMC did not even allege that there had been a mark-up.

    Lastly, the first article stated that Senior Counsel Sundaresh Menon acted for Dr Lim in 2006. This is incorrect. The SMC inquiry commenced in 2007. Dr Lim was first represented by Senior Counsel K. Shanmugam until his appointment as Minister for Law, when he handed over conduct of the case to Mr Menon.

    Mr Menon represented Dr Lim from June 2008 to September last year until his appointment as Attorney-General of Singapore, when he handed over conduct of the case to Dr Lim’s present counsel, Senior Counsel Lee Eng Beng.

    Senior Counsel Lee Eng Beng
    Managing Partner
    Rajah & Tann

    Readers can also join the forum at http://www.temasekreview.com/2011/06/14/case-study-of-singapore-msm-smear-campaign-dr-susan-lim/#comment-434908

  3. Samuel Wisco,MD.

    How anyone could defend this physician is beyond reasoning.

    Her faults were so glaring and unreasonable, the bills were just “out of this WORLD!”.

    Anyone can smell a rat .

    If she insist that she has not done anything wrong, then allow the committee and people to look into it.

    Simple.

  4. Wei Lee

    The truth is the opposite. Dr. Lim is innocent. The Brunei royal patient forced her to stay with her. If you search for foreign news like Indonesia, it is another story. It seems that our news here are censored. Singapore and Brunei are good friends.

  5. This web site Is Truly wonderful and amazing information maybe there is and looking so captivating.. I look and feel good to generally be here.. Keep sharing good things with buddies.. Thanks meant for sharing…

  6. Pingback: Kanker Payudara: Dia Meninggal « Cancer Indonesia

Leave a comment